Remington 1100 Review: The Legendary Semi-Auto Shotgun That Defined a Generation
- Average Joe
- Oct 27, 2025
- 3 min read
Check out the original YouTube video HERE

A Classic American Shotgun
Few firearms have earned the legendary status of the Remington 1100. Since its debut in 1963, this gas-operated semi-automatic has become a staple among hunters, sport shooters, and collectors alike. Reliable, smooth, and endlessly versatile, the 1100 has cemented its place as one of America’s most beloved shotguns.
A Look Back: How the 1100 Came to Be
Before the 1100 came along, Remington had already spent decades refining its semi-auto designs:
1905: The Model 11 — a John Browning long-recoil design.
1948: The Model 11-48 — a refined, lighter version.
1956: The Sportsman 58 — Remington’s first gas-operated shotgun, with manual load adjustment.
Late 1950s: The 878 Automaster — another gas gun, though short-lived.
By the early 1960s, Remington engineers knew it was time for something revolutionary. Led by Wayne Leek, and using early computer design tools, they developed the gas system that would define the Remington 1100.
The Launch of a Legend
Introduced in 1963, the 1100 started as a 12-gauge model before expanding into 16, 20, 28 gauge, and .410 bore variants over the next few years. Its combination of soft recoil, smooth cycling, and refined design made it an instant favorite.
By 1983, Remington had produced over 3 million 1100s, making it America’s best-selling autoloading shotgun of the era.
Early models included:
Field Standard Grade
TB Trap
SA & SB Skeet
D Tournament Grade
F Premier Grade
Over time, Remington introduced more than 30 variations — each tailored for a specific shooting discipline or preference.
Iconic Variations Through the Years to Show Today
1963 Skeet Grade
12 gauge, 26-inch vent rib barrel
Solid rib near receiver (first-year feature)
Lightweight at 7 lbs 13 oz
Smooth 4-lb trigger pull

Perfect for fast skeet shooting, this model is a collector’s dream today.
1974 Field Model
12 gauge, 28-inch barrel with fixed modified choke
Plastic buttplate, no recoil pad
Smooth and reliable — one of the lightest-recoiling shotguns ever made.

1975 Trap Model
30-inch vent rib barrel with mid-bead sight
Raised comb and beautiful walnut stock
Heavier at 8 lbs 9 oz
Crisp 3-lb trigger — ideal for trap shooting.

1976 28-Gauge Skeet
Lightweight at 6 lbs 7 oz
25-inch barrel with mid-bead sight
Highly sought-after for its rarity and balance.
If you find one, grab it — these are scarce and bring a premium on the collector’s market.
1992 Special Field
Compact 21-inch barrel with RemChokes
Straight English stock
Designed for upland hunters needing a quick, lightweight gun.
Only 7 lbs with a 4-lb trigger pull.

2015 Competition Synthetic
30-inch Pro-Bore barrel
Adjustable comb and pad for fit customization
Available in walnut or synthetic carbon fiber finishes
Built for competitive shooters wanting precision and modern features.

Why the Remington 1100 Still Matters
Even six decades later, the Remington 1100 remains a benchmark in shotgun design. Its gas-operated system delivers exceptionally soft recoil, and its balance and fit are second to none. Whether for trap, skeet, or field work, the 1100 performs with timeless consistency.
While newer semi-autos like the Beretta A400 or Browning Maxus boast modern updates, the 1100’s legacy is unmatched. It’s a true workhorse with the elegance of an American classic.
Final Thoughts
The Remington 1100 is more than just a firearm—it’s a piece of shooting history. Its influence spans generations, and its continued presence on store shelves proves how right Remington got it back in 1963.
If you come across one in good condition for a fair price, don’t hesitate. You’ll be adding one of the smoothest, most reliable semi-autos ever made to your collection.
What’s your favorite Remington 1100 model?

Drop your thoughts in the comments below — we’d love to hear your stories.
And don’t forget to subscribe to Average Joe’s Armory for more classic gun reviews, range tests, and historical deep dives.




Comments